Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Saturday Dentist Austin Texas

156. ‘Legalidad democrática’ pone en jaque a seguridad ‘dizque democrática’


SO THE VEO YO - Year 6

Fajardo Mockus and have no 'tail of straw' and this makes a big difference

By Juan Rubbini

juanrubbini@hotmail.com
http:// www.lapazencolombia.blogspot.com/



"There is no greater honor than that of himself, of his affections" Baltasar Gracian
, Oracle


Acierta manual on 'good law' Antanas Mockus, and it is one of the keys to his success, when out of the cards for the trump card of 'democratic legitimacy'. Theirs is dialectical of good-and that is not easy-to propose not abandoning the "democratic security" but absorption and re-legitimization in a senior thesis that wrap and protect their own excesses and deviations. They are right

also when they demobilized paramilitaries Justice and Peace, and their submissions to the Supreme Court of Justice, truth and reparation scenarios, spaces of reintegration into society through respect for the law and rules and procedures. These same rules and procedures for governments, officials and soldiers, by not a few whole boxes of today given called 'bad apples', raped mercilessly when bare, indoctrination, recruitment and arming paramilitary successive generations of paramilitaries, whom not even the gates of funding narco they were closed. Guerrillas and paramilitaries

-ideologies-are also separate, especially from the second half of the 80-products and by the same state of things that allowed the drug trade did much of the territory, awareness and the country's economy. Also clear policy "and why not? if that that the end justifies the means was run and how, with what intensity and reproducibility.

If Mockus and Fajardo are climbing a hill unthinkable in the second place is first and foremost because millions of minds are holding their quixotic. Not a product of the media, or advertising, much less the political class. But are its consequence, in the sense that ad nauseam by polarization-antiuribista Uribe created the need, between physical and spiritual, to open wide the windows and let in fresh air and renewed, and air nature green, which not coincidentally is her color and hope. Uribe's self-congratulatory propaganda, of messianism, the "what would they do without me? repeated as endless litany has finally become a boomerang, to awaken millions of minds ready to respond: with or without Uribe Uribe, with or without Uribe Uribe in the government, Colombia goes ahead after the country that we love deserve. No more missing that touch us to worship a god Uribe Uribe and practice a religion.

Forty days after the first round Naomi and the Conservatives are the true balance. They are the only weights but the weights are more weighed to the pendulum is Uribe side or pass side of the 'green'. It could also happen that Naomi tried it today and it seems impossible to reach the second round and then beat Santos to the votes of the greens, reds and yellows. But this should be more bold and 'independent' differentiation of Uribe, who will appear as more than overcome emulate or continue. There is much hope that Naomi conservative turn of 'Uribe does not want' to 'independence' of the once, 1998, was a precursor and promise, and if this is not enough to overcome Mockus and company, at least if you reach to join the wave of renewal that will vote against all walked past and democratic legality. Naomi hard dilemma but if it solves positively the Presidency can be yours, for two simple reasons: because it has the sense of 'without Uribe Uribe "that many Uribe pleased, and also the sense of' independent candidate 'to many conservatives, liberals and ordinary people do not dislike. In any case, I see more intellectually and emotionally close to Naomi of four former mayors of Santos. Vargas and see more about Juan Manuel Pardo and Petro and eager to vote, without saying a peep-a Mockus and Fajardo in the second round.

However, the upcoming presidential elections have nothing to do in relation to the dispute between right and left. Right and left have shown in recent years that appeal to arms without pruritus ethical, and thus is not available or not the war that the dispute. Needless to say, patronage in politics are the Liberals and Conservatives but also the Pole. Patronage is not nor to distinguish between left and right. Neither private property is at issue, much less human rights and freedoms. So things the 'democratic legitimacy' that flag should be obvious-so obvious as in 2002 the 'safety-democrática' becomes ace in the hole that Mockus and Fajardo have been able to capitalize on their behalf. And not coincidentally, are the only ones for lack of 'tail of straw' can bring out the fear that someone without cause terror by simply displaying a lighted match.

If the 'democratic legitimacy', respect for the rules of the game acquired in 2010 such a political value to the citizens that everything else becomes secondary will be good for the armed conflict seriously think if you have not time to join the wave before the green tsunami has completed its historic mission: I mean that both the State and illegal, the guerrillas and the paramilitaries, drug traffickers and their associated networks, will have to negotiate seriously civilized the closure of its operations 'criminal lawlessness, economic or political' that vast and intricate ramifications has covered the territory and soul of Colombians in the last sixty years, that an approximate date and eloquent, since the assassination of Jorge Eliecer Gaitan. Although it sounds paradoxical

these illegalities are endemic which also include emerging emerging-that have very little, who should appear more interested in waiting with hope and a triumph of Mockus Fajardo, as good scientists who will have plenty of approaches to help passage of illegality to legality. Because it is not to exterminate people but to convert. This is not only ethical and humane, but to evangelical religion. "There is more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over a thousand just to do the will of God." Is that justice must be fair, not too little nor too much, just Fair. Who requires the maximum punishment, or the maximum penalty is not being fair, but revenge, retaliation, more concerned with retaliation claim that the law of God, or transitional restorative justice is appropriate that we apply here and now , and invited everyone without exception must be willing to repentance and forgiveness.

you ever heard Sergio Fajardo said that being creative is not inventing something new every day, but being creative is something deeper and more simple: "to see what everyone sees and ask the question that nobody has done. " I'm sure if they reach the Government, both as Fajardo Mockus, not only are able to to view the tragedy of the Colombian armed conflict which all presidential candidates are seeing but also ask the questions that none of the others have managed to make.

And then yes, the 'democratic rule', not sectarian and Jacobean revenge or self-righteousness hypocritical and fallacious, come the right answer.



So I see myself.

The 156 articles included in the published series, begun in 2005 - ASI YO LA VEO available to the reader in www.lapazencolombia.blogspot.comHYPERLINK "http://www.lapazencolombia.blogspot.com"

0 comments:

Post a Comment