SO THE VEO YO - Year 6
legal and illegal actors and a chat 'one on one'
By Juan Rubbini
juanrubbini@hotmail.com
.................... ...
Santos
The Government should take the initiative in matters of peace. Stop making concessions 'warmongers' who 'live' in the conflict. Taking the initiative means putting on the table a bold invitation to the guerrillas to make it impossible to say no. Bold, at this point in the history of armed conflict, means "put a stop to this and make it so that Colombia is truly a country where everyone fits." A few wise words.
The conflict will not end, not even going to let up, necessarily, just because guerrillas and government sit down to talk. Peace is a process, a journey. Provocations and sabotage are expected of both parties and should not make a dent. It is instituting a "face to face ', not talk-we talk to older folks," but first and foremost to talk, of 'one on one. " Each side with their arguments, each with what is, with its wealth of history, present and future
The guerrillas considered legitimate struggle and meet their demands. There is no shortage organizations and foreign governments that are sympathetic to, or explain its existence. The Government knows vested constitutional legality and legitimacy in this context is not discussed. Not disputed by the international community. The guerrillas are not the only 'illegal' of conflict, there are 'paramilitaries' that way 'BACRIM' drink from the same waters as FARC and ELN narco its connection and its influence on illicit crops and the narco-economy. Needless to say, the state tree and still have hung dangling a few rotten apples that neither look nor helpless.
No, in good faith, may withhold or fail to recognize that the most important-generation self-defense Castaño negotiated peace with truth, justice and reparation, and there is answerable to the justice of here and that of United States. This may not have been the result of the agreements, but rather of Santa Fe Ralito disagreements, but the truth is that they were demobilized, surrendered their weapons and refused to join the 'new paramilitaries' that even today' black work "laid the foundations for the new wave of armed conflict. New wave with which today we dance, that the Uribe government left wild flower reinsurance "maybe? for what was to happen, his government passed between guerrillas and state. Or even between Chávez, FARC and Colombia. Today we are dealing
-citizens, with a state of affairs that only a madman could see with eyes triumphant. How to raise even as a hypothesis the possibility of feeling triumphant? What we are talking about winning? Who really won Uribe on 'descomplejizar' the conflict? It is not, it must be said that the guerrillas can claim victory in the situation in which are-that either-or that the new leaders 'paramilitaries' are bound to pass without afugias, nor that the drug dealers feel safe somewhere. But none of them-I mean 'illegal estates' of conflict-joint feel like they are living the' end of the end. " Be captured or die, part of the job, results that every revolutionary or counterrevolutionary, drug or criminal, is assumed, and for one reason or another decides to take personal risk. The truth is that the incentives to commit crimes, political crimes or not, there are still large-scale in Colombia Uribe left us. And this is troubling and that the Government should resolve Santos. Not bad, it is impossible, yet undesirable, but the good ones, because not only is possible, though difficult, but desirable and advisable in terms of minimizing future victims and the generation of new offenders.
Somehow, there is a "strategic stalemate," a stand-off where the Government can show results favorable to their cause, but the 'illegal' also harvest an occasional triumph, mixed with losses, but they are losses that hurt though and moves do not affect the core of the conflict or jeopardize their precarious balance, but balance at the end.
So, Colombia can not suck-as long as the armed conflict with no leadership in the area, as suggested by Santos-Holguín statements. Nor revolutionize and expand its urban and rural economy so powerful currents flowing circuits investors and international trade-return-to improve productivity, employment and national income Colombians.
not just the government, the guerrillas must also assume that this tie unsatisfactory for the purposes of one or the other, even those two are the only partners of the dialogues that take to build the country where we all fit. The conflict mutates to the decades that have passed and are not alone, state and guerrillas on the stage of war and peace. State and guerrillas must assume that there are forms of illegality that were born from the depths and banks of the old confrontation and have grown not only economically and politically, but their ability to do damage is significant and will grow if not solved the problems explained the existence of such illegality inserted into the country. Colombia
not emerge as a regional power but of social standing and legal convergence of at least four elements that today remain illegally dislocated or systematic: the state, guerrillas, paramilitaries and narco. " These are the pieces of the puzzle on which the Government Santos faces the challenge of articulating a "reengineering" civil, harmonious and within the law. This is the 'model kit' and for which there is no other way but dialogue and agreements, with appropriate mediation, security and complacency of the international community.
Pope Ratzinger, the Pope's theologian, said today in Rome that "Man is in danger because they live as if God did not exist."
Believers or not we can paraphrase this sentence from the Pope and say out loud for the world also heard that "Colombia is in danger because there are killed and die as if a negotiated political solution not exist. "
So I see myself.
The 172 articles included in the published series, launched in March 2005 - ASI YO LA VEO available to the reader in www.lapazencolombia.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment